Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	40.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte A320M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211224
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '23 at 11:20
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	62%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$816 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 70.7 1-Core 90 2-Core 179 64% 113 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 380 48% 367 Pts	64-Core 378 23% 378 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$1,217 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Nvidia(10DE 1363) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.34 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.5% Average	Lighting 49.3 Reflection 78 Parallax 48.5 40% 58.6 fps	MRender 63.6 Gravity 46.4 Splatting 44 41% 51.3 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 256GB 9,539 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: V9002s45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 60 37 37 30 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	35% Below average	Read 266 Write 366 Mixed 217 SusWrite 46.3 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 76 4K Mixed 2.5 56% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 85.8 81% 124 MB/s
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 228%
Crucial BX500 120GB-$118 37,154 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 111GB free Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 347 66 53 54 53 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Read 464 Write 392 Mixed 336 SusWrite 144 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 71.1 4K Mixed 27.5 124% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 44.4 91% 180 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M378A1K43BB2G3A141 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 3000, 3000 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	95.4% Outstanding	MC Read 35.8 MC Write 37.3 MC Mixed 32.2 100% 35.1 GB/s	SC Read 21.3 SC Write 38 SC Mixed 24.7 80% 28 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 28: 0P 2R 3G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
28%	34%	41	208	58	0	32"	1280 720	GDH0030 PHILCO

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $667Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	305x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $1,126Bench 73%, 446,215 samples	292x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $730Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	256x

GPU
RX 570AMD $1,334Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	204x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $785Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	179x
GTX 1650Nvidia $1,217Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	161x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $173Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	151x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	63x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $392Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	55x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	55x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	52x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $634Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	47x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $2,174

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $310	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $215	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $397	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $140	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $800	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $56	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16