Asus H87M-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 mins ago, 2 mins ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '23 at 12:04
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	LVA-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$942 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	78.3% Very good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 102 2-Core 198 76% 130 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 520 55% 438 Pts	64-Core 506 31% 506 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$785 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.42 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.1% Poor	Lighting 36.7 Reflection 40.3 Parallax 37.8 30% 38.3 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 38.7 Splatting 26.9 27% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 180GB 4,011 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: DC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 135 147 159 147 176 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Read 332 Write 183 Mixed 229 SusWrite 152 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 75.4 4K Mixed 34.1 130% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 136 129% 202 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$549 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 173 172 175 182 173 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Read 171 Write 148 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 171 102% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F Kingston 99U5403-050.A00LF 1315 BLT8G3D1869DT1TX0. 16GB 1600, 1333, 1867 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.5% Average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 12.5 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 14.3 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	60	34"	1280 720	PHL093D PHL 345B1C

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-PRO Builds (Compare 341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PRO - $948

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $589Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	71x
Core i5-4670Intel $942Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	46x
Core i5-4570Intel $801Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	43x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $118Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	31x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $785Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	23x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $1,099Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $173Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $259Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $1,115Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	9x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	16x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	8x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $1,827

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $310	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $215	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $397	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $140	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $800	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $56	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16