Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results


Gaming 100% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 102% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

29 mins ago, 5 mins ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201201
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '23 at 12:02
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$1,648 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Memory 80 1-Core 141 2-Core 276 90% 166 Pts	4-Core 505 8-Core 937 86% 721 Pts	64-Core 1,409 87% 1,409 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$2,970 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Gigabyte(1458 4008) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	112% Outstanding	Lighting 142 Reflection 145 Parallax 144 116% 144 fps	MRender 181 Gravity 130 Splatting 117 114% 142 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$235 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 2511 Write 2,350 Mixed 1,787 493% 2,216 MB/s	4K Read 70 4K Write 166 4K Mixed 89.1 308% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 1,377 DQ Write 813 DQ Mixed 792 671% 994 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$1,766 44,466 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 2TB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 437 431 415 439 442 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 479 Write 420 Mixed 429 SusWrite 433 99% 440 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 50.1 166% 57.9 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 205 154% 206 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$455 346,786 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	MC Read 33.2 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 33.8 87% 30.3 GB/s	SC Read 25.9 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 33.8 79% 27.7 GB/s	Latency 78.7 51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 14: 0P 1R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
14%	17%	35	218	60	144	27"	1280 720	SAM0E16 C27HG7x

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,599 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 117%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $730Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	458x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $1,648Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	452x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $1,020Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	326x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $3,846Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	230x
RTX 3080Nvidia $4,357Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	178x
RX 5700-XTAMD $2,267Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	145x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $353Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	105x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $392Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	95x
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TBBench 430%, 44,185 samples	63x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $353Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	89x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	69x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $5,283

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $310	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $215	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $397	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $140	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $800	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $56	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16