Intel H61

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	43.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	15.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Intel H61 (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210115
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '23 at 11:27
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	46%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$2,333 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Memory 84.7 1-Core 81 2-Core 62.8 54% 76.2 Pts	4-Core 136 8-Core 164 19% 150 Pts	64-Core 194 12% 194 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$1,217 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.13 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	43.7% Average	Lighting 57.1 Reflection 57.7 Parallax 49.6 46% 54.8 fps	MRender 42.3 Gravity 50.8 Splatting 46.3 38% 46.5 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
HX480GSSDSATA3 480GB 126 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0411A SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 30 28 19 32 26 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	15.4% Very poor	Read 62.9 Write 96.8 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 33.4 12% 53.1 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 11.5 34% 8.73 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 91%
Seagate ST2000NM0125 2TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 551GB free Firmware: NS00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 110 126 121 127 128 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Read 214 Write 206 Mixed 82.6 SusWrite 122 114% 156 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 1.2 280% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 122%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-050.A00LF 2x8GB 1,731 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	56.5% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 18 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 17.7 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 29: 0P 3R 2G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
29%	32%	40	217	59	60	23.5"	1920 1017	DELD08E DELL SE2417HG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61 Builds (Compare 8,726 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H61

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $1,170Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	1,655x
Core i5-2400Intel $157Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	866x
Core i7-3770Intel $2,333Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	837x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1,724x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,204x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	577x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $173Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	420x
BX500 240GBCrucial $141Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	237x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	222x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	483x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	477x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	221x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $1,342

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $310	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $215	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $397	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $140	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $800	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $56	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16