Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

45 mins ago, 15 mins ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190912
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '23 at 11:22
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$1,126 446,215 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Memory 76.1 1-Core 110 2-Core 180 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 572 52% 436 Pts	64-Core 814 50% 814 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$1,570 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Gigabyte(1458 2311) CLim: 1625 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.2 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57% Above average	Lighting 73.2 Reflection 64 Parallax 97.8 60% 78.3 fps	MRender 63.7 Gravity 82.1 Splatting 49.4 52% 65.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT250MX500SSD4 250GB 16,301 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 433 436 442 171 207 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 437 Mixed 430 SusWrite 351 97% 430 MB/s	4K Read 38.6 4K Write 82.1 4K Mixed 50.2 166% 57 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 276 DQ Mixed 242 191% 264 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$310 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 715GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 204 199 204 206 204 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 192 Write 88.2 Mixed 80.4 SusWrite 203 103% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	MC Read 33.9 MC Write 31.2 MC Mixed 28.6 89% 31.2 GB/s	SC Read 22.8 SC Write 31 SC Mixed 22.9 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 89.2 45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 22: 0P 3R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
22%	32%	19	205	59	60	27"	1280 720	HWV62F5 XWU-CBA

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,847 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $730Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,238x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $1,126Bench 73%, 446,215 samples	745x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $1,727Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	431x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $2,189Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	385x
RX 580AMD $1,020Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	273x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $1,609Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	262x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $173Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	135x
A400 480GBKingston $259Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	118x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $392Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	116x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $353Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	359x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	214x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $337Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	184x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $3,444

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $310	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $215	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $397	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $140	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $800	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $56	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16